Summary of prep providers for the Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE)

Updated

Aug 1, 2024

Summary

Price and packages

Ideal for

Intro

For those unfamiliar with the SQE1 - it's a standardised, 360-question, multiple-choice examination, and is stage one in passing the SQE in the United Kingdom.

At Practice Works - we've created the most advanced AI-native learning platform, tailored to the SQE1.

As part of my research, I've scoured the different options for students.

Here's a summary of what I've found. I'll keep updating it every few months so that it stays relevant.

Comparison of the prep providers for SQE1

Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) focused Products

There are a few multiple-choice question centric options

Old school Full Course Providers (classes + Notes + MCQs)

And of course, we also have the big players in the space who offer a more traditional, old-school product.
Including in-person or video classes, textbooks, flashcards, etc.

Summaries of each prep provider from direct user experiences

I've trawled through dozens (maybe hundreds) of social media posts and threads, to understand people's direct experiences with different prep providers here.

Note: these summaries are weighted towards reported direct user experience over hearsay.

Let's get cracking.

Barbri

Last updated on the 13th Feb 2024

Pros

Structured and concise materials
Offers practice tests and mock exams
Provides flashcards, MCQs, and "high-yield" notes
Learning support through coaching
Cheaper options available with discounts

Cons

Lacks detail in finer legal points
Mock exam questions not reflective of real test scenarios
Some find the practice tests and mocks too easy
Reports of not preparing students adequately for exams
Some users needed supplementary materials for success

Headline summary

BARBRI is a mixed bag of experiences, with its structured approach and comprehensive materials praised by many. The practice tests, coaching support, and accessible pricing make it a go-to for many aspiring legal professionals.

However, a general widespread critique centres on BARBRI's depth of coverage, particularly in the finer legal details crucial for passing the exam.

The mock exams, while helpful, are regarded to fall short of the real test's complexity, and people often seek complementary resources for this.

Despite these issues, BARBRI's offerings are solid - especially for those with prior legal knowledge or seeking a structured study plan.

tl/dr- BARBRI has strengths, particularly in organisation and accessibility. Individuals may want to supplement their studies with more detailed resources, or consider other providers for a more nuanced understanding of the law.

BPP

Last updated on the 13th Feb 2024

Pros

Good SQE pass rate.
Effective teaching materials.
Faculty generally competent.
Study materials well-tailored to SQE1.
Provides core content coverage.

Cons

Administration and organization poor.
Inadequate support and care.
Exam regulation changes without notice.
Practice questions not sufficient or representative.
Teaching lacks depth, not fully grasping SQE1 content.

Headline summary

People recommend caution when considering BPP for SQE preparation. While they boast respectable pass rates and generally competent teaching materials, there are drawbacks.

The administration is known for being unreliable, and student support appears lacking.

Key criticisms include poor communication, changes without notice, and insufficient practice questions that do not accurately reflect exam difficulty. Also, the depth of teaching for SQE1 content has gaps, failing to adequately prepare students.

For those prioritising support and comprehensive preparation, exploring other providers or supplementing BPP's materials is advised.

University of Law

Last updated on the 13th Feb 2024

Pros

Revision app for MCQ practice.
Offers a comprehensive LLM Legal Practice (SQE1&2) Course.
Access to in-person lectures for direct queries.
Recognized and respected educational institution.

Cons

Administration and organization poor.
Practice questions not sufficient or representative.
Quality of online course lags behind in-person sessions.
Courses can be pricey, with extra commuting costs.
Some tutors may not meet student expectations.

Headline summary

The university offers valuable resources like a revision app and comprehensive course materials that include a mix of practice questions offering solid preparation content

However, the administration is often criticised for being disorganised, and there's a heavy reliance on self-study, which might not suit everyone.

Additionally, the cost of the courses is significant, especially when considering additional expenses like commuting.

For those able to navigate these challenges, UoL is a solid option for SQE preparation, especially for those valuing direct access to lecturers and the prestige of an LLM qualification.

QLTS

Last updated on the 13th Feb 2024

Pros

Mocks are challenging but effective.
Comprehensive textbooks, though wordy.
Useful summary notes for consolidation.
Helpful feedback from mocks/practice MCQs.
Provides a lot of information, aiding deep learning.

Cons

Mocks may be overly complicated, causing unnecessary worry.
Textbooks can be too verbose, making study cumbersome.
Occasional typos in materials.
Lacks structured learning approach.
May require additional resources for complete exam preparation.

Headline summary

QLTS is recommended for its rigorous mock tests and comprehensive materials, which are often cited as closely mirroring the actual exams, sometimes even more challenging.

This ensures that learners are well-prepared, although the added complexity in mock materials might cause undue stress.

The textbooks are thoough, but criticised for verbosity and occasional typos, suggesting a need for selective reading.

The practice tests are particularly valued for their realistic difficulty and constructive feedback, although the lack of structured learning may not suit everyone.

Those wanting well-rounded prep might need to supplement QLTS resources with other materials to cover gaps, especially in areas requiring more structured learning.